Dukepoo v. Prewitt et al
| Monty V Dukepoo |
| Unknown Prewitt, Unknown Redd, Unknown Hooke and Unknown Adrion |
| 2:2010cv01216 |
| June 7, 2010 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Phoenix Division Office |
| Pinal |
| Robert C Broomfield |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
13
ORDER denying pla's 11 Notice demanding return of his filing fee. This case must remain closed. Signed by Judge Robert C Broomfield on 8/31/10. (LAD)
|
|
Filing
9
ORDER Directing Monthly Payments be made from Prison Account of Monty Dukepoo. Signed by Judge Robert C Broomfield on 08/15/10. (ESL)
|
|
Filing
7
ORDER that pla's 5 Letter, to the extent it seeks an extension of time, is granted. Within 30 days of the date this Order is filed, Plaintiff must either pay the $350.00 filing fee or file a complete Application to Proceed In Forma Pauper is and a certified six-month trust account statement from each institution where he was confined during the six-month period preceding the filing of the Complaint. If Plaintiff fails to either pay the $350.00 filing fee or file a complete Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis within 30 days, the Clerk of Court must enter a judgment of dismissal of this action without prejudice and without further notice to Plaintiff. Signed by Judge Robert C Broomfield on 7/25/10. (LAD)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
