Paisley, et al. v. Brewer, et al.

Plaintiff: Kelly Paisley and Sandra Bahr
Defendant: Jan Brewer, Benjamin H Grumbles, Arizona Department of Environmental Quality and Arizona, State of
Case Number: 2:2010cv01253
Filed: June 14, 2010
Court: Arizona District Court
Office: Phoenix Division Office
County: Maricopa
Presiding Judge: David G Campbell
Nature of Suit: Environmental Matters
Cause of Action: 42:7604
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
September 2, 2011 51 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER Plaintiffs' motion for summary judgment (Doc. 40) is granted. Defendants' motion for summary judgment (Doc. 38) is denied. The Court enters the following declaratory relief: To the extent H.B. 2012 repealed portions of A.R.S. § 5 -522(A) that are included in the SIP, and repealed the statutory provisions establishing the LTAF, see A.R.S. § 28-8101 et seq., the bill is ineffective and preempted by federal law. The requirement to deposit lottery funds into the LTAF as set forth in the EPA-approved SIP remains in full force and effect. The Court intends to enter an appropriate injunction against Defendant Ducey to reinstate the deposit and disbursement of Arizona lottery funds into and from the LTAF as required by the SIP. The parties are directed to confer and submit to the Court a jointly proposed form of injunction by September 23, 2011. If the parties are unable to agree, they shall, by September 23, 2011, provide the Court with memoranda (not to exceed 7 pages each) setting forth their positions on an appropriate injunction. Signed by Judge David G Campbell on 9/2/2011.(KMG)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Paisley, et al. v. Brewer, et al.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Jan Brewer
Represented By: James T Skardon
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Benjamin H Grumbles
Represented By: James T Skardon
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Arizona Department of Environmental Quality
Represented By: James T Skardon
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Arizona, State of
Represented By: James T Skardon
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Kelly Paisley
Represented By: Joy E Herr-Cardillo
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Sandra Bahr
Represented By: Joy E Herr-Cardillo
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?