Walker v. Ryan et al
| Sheldon Walker |
| Charles L Ryan and Jerry Dunn |
| 2:2010cv01408 |
| July 7, 2010 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Phoenix Division Office |
| Pinal |
| Lawrence O Anderson |
| Mary H Murguia |
| Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
151
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 134 Plaintiff's Motion to Compel. See PDF document for details. Signed by Magistrate Judge Lawrence O Anderson on 9/26/12.(LSP)
|
|
Filing
150
ORDER granting 149 Plaintiff's Motion for Extension of Time to File Response to Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment. Plaintiff does not need to file his Response until further order setting said time for a response is entered by the Court. Signed by Magistrate Judge Lawrence O Anderson on 9/6/12.(LSP)
|
|
Filing
142
ORDER denying without prejudice 139 Plaintiff's Motion to Appoint Counsel. Signed by Magistrate Judge Lawrence O Anderson on 7/9/12.(LSP)
|
|
Filing
136
ORDER AND OPINION that Magistrate Judge Anderson's order was not contrary to law, and further finding that none of his rulings are clearly erroneous, therefore denying 129 Motion for Review. Signed by Judge John W Sedwick on 6/14/2012.(LSP)
|
|
Filing
125
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 110 Plaintiff's Motion to Compel, see PDF document for details. Signed by Magistrate Judge Lawrence O Anderson on 5/7/12.(LSP)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
