Mendoza v. Sky Harbor Inn

Plaintiff: David Mendoza
Defendant: Sky Harbor Inn
Case Number: 2:2010cv01537
Filed: July 20, 2010
Court: Arizona District Court
Office: Phoenix Division Office
County: Maricopa
Presiding Judge: Lawrence O Anderson
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1981
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
August 26, 2010 10 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER - IT IS ORDERED that Pla's 1 Complaint is dismissed withoutprejudice for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, failure to allege sufficient facts to state a plausible claim, and failure to comply with prior court orders. The Clerk of Court is directed to terminate this action.FURTHER ORDERED that all pending motions are denied as moot. 4 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis is denied as moot. Signed by Magistrate Judge Lawrence O Anderson on 8/25/10. (SAT)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Mendoza v. Sky Harbor Inn
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: David Mendoza
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Sky Harbor Inn
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?