Kunz v. DJO, LLC et al
| Joseph M Kunz |
| DJO LLC, DJO Incorporated and I-Flow Corporation |
| 2:2010cv01587 |
| July 27, 2010 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Phoenix Division Office |
| XX US, Outside State |
| James A Teilborg |
| Personal Injury- Product Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
59
ORDER - IT IS ORDERED that the 17 Motion to dismiss is denied without prejudice. FURTHER ORDERED that Pla shall file an amended complaint within 20 days of the date of this Order properly pleading federal subject matter jurisdiction or this case wi ll be dismissed, without prejudice, for lack of federal subject matter jurisdiction. FURTHER ORDERED that, if Pla files an amended complaint, Dfts shall answer or otherwise respond to the amended complaint within 20 days of the date the amended compl aint is filed. IT IS FINALLY ORDERED that if a motion to dismiss is filed in response to the amended complaint, Pla shall respond to the motion within the time limit set in the Local Civil Rules for the District of Arizona; failure to timely respond will be deemed consent to the Court granting the motion. See Local Rule Civil 7.2(i). Signed by Judge James A Teilborg on 8/17/10. (SAT)
|
|
Filing
38
ORDER Transferring Case to District of Arizona(Written Opinion). Signed by Senior Judge David S. Doty on 7/26/2010. (PJM) [Transferred from mnd on 7/27/2010.]
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
