Reuben v. Goddard et al
| Howard J Reuben |
| Terry L Goddard, Lisa Wynn, Celina Shepherd, David Greenberg, Michael Sucher, Kathleen Coffer, Arizona Medical Board and Kenyada Corley |
| 2:2010cv01617 |
| July 30, 2010 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Phoenix Division Office |
| Maricopa |
| Mary H Murguia |
| Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
54
ORDER AND OPINION granting 50 defendants' Motion to Dismiss plaintiff's amended complaint. Signed by Judge John W Sedwick on 4/1/11.(LSP)
|
|
Filing
37
ORDER AND OPINION that the motions at dockets 10 and 28 to dismiss the claims against Goddard, Wynn, Shepherd, Coffer, Greenberg, and Sucher are granted, and the claims are dismissed without prejudice to an amended complaint. Any amended complain t must be filed within 14 days of this order. Dft Arizona Medical Board's 11 motion to dismiss the claims against it is granted, and the claims against the Arizona Medical Board are dismissed. Dfts' 12 motion to dismiss the claims again st Goddard, Wynn, Shepherd, and Coffer for failure to comply with Arizona's notice of claim statute is denied. Pla's 16 motion to dismiss dft Corley is construed as a notice of dismissal. The Clerk will please terminate Kenyada Corley as a dft. Signed by Judge John W Sedwick on 02/18/11. (ESL)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
