Nareau v. Maricopa County Estrella Jail

Justia Dockets & Filings Ninth Circuit Arizona District Court Nareau v. Maricopa County Estrella Jail

Nareau v. Maricopa County Estrella Jail

Plaintiff:	Tanya Delgadillo Nareau
Defendant:	Maricopa County Estrella Jail
Case Number:	2:2010cv01791
Filed:	August 20, 2010
Court:	US District Court for the District of Arizona
Office:	Phoenix Division Office
County:	Maricopa
Presiding Judge:	David K Duncan (PS)
Presiding Judge:	David G Campbell
Nature of Suit:	Prison Condition
Cause of Action:	42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
April 13, 2011	Filing 12 ORDER that pursuant to Rule 41(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure this action is dismissed without prejudice and the Clerk of the Court shall enter judgment accordingly. Signed by Judge David G Campbell on 04/13/11. (ESL)
October 29, 2010	Filing 5 ORDER that Pla's 3 MOTION (Application) to Proceed In Forma Pauperis is granted. As required by the accompanying Order to the appropriate government agency, Pla must pay the $350.00 filing fee and is assessed an initial partial filing fee of $17.69. The Complaint (Doc. 1) is dismissed for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. Pla has 30 days from the date this Order is filed to file a first amended complaint in compliance with this Order. If Pla fails to com ply, the Clerk of Court must, without further notice, enter a judgment of dismissal of this action with prejudice that states that the dismissal may count as a "strike" under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). Signed by Judge David G Campbell on 10/29/10. (ESL)

Date Filed

Document Text

April 13, 2011

Filing 12 ORDER that pursuant to Rule 41(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure this action is dismissed without prejudice and the Clerk of the Court shall enter judgment accordingly. Signed by Judge David G Campbell on 04/13/11. (ESL)

October 29, 2010

Filing 5 ORDER that Pla's 3 MOTION (Application) to Proceed In Forma Pauperis is granted. As required by the accompanying Order to the appropriate government agency, Pla must pay the $350.00 filing fee and is assessed an initial partial filing fee of $17.69. The Complaint (Doc. 1) is dismissed for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. Pla has 30 days from the date this Order is filed to file a first amended complaint in compliance with this Order. If Pla fails to com ply, the Clerk of Court must, without further notice, enter a judgment of dismissal of this action with prejudice that states that the dismissal may count as a "strike" under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). Signed by Judge David G Campbell on 10/29/10. (ESL)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Nareau v. Maricopa County Estrella Jail
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Tanya Delgadillo Nareau
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Maricopa County Estrella Jail
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?