Standley v. Ryan et al
| David Standley |
| A Ramos, J Freeland, H Matson, J James, R Patton, Unknown Lewenski and Charles L Ryan |
| 2:2010cv01867 |
| August 31, 2010 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Phoenix Division Office |
| Pinal |
| David G Campbell |
| Edward C Voss |
| Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
47
ORDER that the reference to the Magistrate is withdrawn as to Defendants' 43 Motion for Summary Judgment. Defendants' 43 motion is granted. Plaintiff's claims that he was denied cleaning supplies for the recreation pen, that he was denied clothes for recreation, and that he was subjected to constant cell illumination are dismissed without prejudice for failure to exhaust administrative remedies; all other claims are dismissed with prejudice. The Clerk of Court must enter judgment accordingly and terminate the action. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), an appeal from the judgment in this action would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Judge David G Campbell on 8/13/2012.(LFIG)
|
|
Filing
8
ORDER (Service Packet) - IT IS ORDERED Pla's Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (Doc. 4 ) is granted. Pla must pay the $350.00 filing fee and is assessed an initial partial filing fee of $25.79. Plas "Motion For Appointment Of Counsel" (Doc. 3 ) and "Motion/Motion For Reconsideration - Appointment Of Counsel" (Doc. 6 ) are both denied. Pla's medical claim in Count II of the Complaint (Doc. 1 ) is dismissed for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. Count III of the Complaint (Doc. 1 ) is dismissed for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. Dfts ADOC and Dennis Kendall are dismissed from this action for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. Dfts Charles L Ryan, A Ramos, Lewenski, J Freeland, H Matson, J James, and R Patton must answer Count I of the Complaint (Doc. 1 ) and Dfts Charles L Ryan, J Freeland, and A Ramos must answer the conditions-of-confinement claim in Count II of the Complaint (Doc. 1 ). The Clerk of Court must send Pla a service packet including the Complaint (Doc. 1 ), this Order, and both summons and request for waiver forms for Dfts Charles L Ryan, A Ramos, J Freeland, H Matson, J James, R Patton, a nd Lewenski. Pla must complete and return the service packet to the Clerk of Court within 21 days of the date of filing of this Order. Dfts Charles L Ryan, A Ramos, J Freeland, H Matson, J James, R Patton, and Lewenski must answer the Complaint or ot herwise respond by appropriate motion within the time provided by the applicable provisions of Rule 12(a) of the FRCivP. This matter is referred to Magistrate Judge Edward C. Voss for all pretrial proceedings as authorized under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Signed by Judge David G Campbell on 11/23/10. (SAT)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
