Garcia-Espinoza v. United States of America

Justia Dockets & Filings Ninth Circuit Arizona District Court Garcia-Espinoza v. United States of America

Garcia-Espinoza v. United States of America

Petitioner:	Rafael Garcia-Espinoza
Respondent:	United States of America
Case Number:	2:2010cv02006
Filed:	September 20, 2010
Court:	US District Court for the District of Arizona
Office:	Phoenix Division Office
County:	Pinal
Presiding Judge:	Lawrence O Anderson (PS)
Presiding Judge:	David G Campbell
Nature of Suit:	Motions to Vacate Sentence
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 2255
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
July 12, 2011	Filing 11 ORDER - The Clerk of Court must terminate Doc. 24 in CR 10-616-PHX-DGC.The Second Amended Motion under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 to Vacate, Set Aside orCorrect Sentence (Doc. 10 in CV 10-2006-PHX-DGC (LOA)) is denied and the civil action opened in connec tion with this Motion (CV 10-2006-PHX-DGC (LOA)) is dismissed with prejudice. The Clerk of Court must enter judgment accordingly.Pursuant to Rule 11(a) of the Rules Governing Section 2255 Cases, in the eventMovant files an appeal, the Court declines to issue a certificate of appealability because reasonable jurists would not find the Courts procedural ruling debatable. See Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000). (See document for further details). Signed by Judge David G Campbell on 7/12/11.(LAD)

Date Filed

Document Text

July 12, 2011

Filing 11 ORDER - The Clerk of Court must terminate Doc. 24 in CR 10-616-PHX-DGC.The Second Amended Motion under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 to Vacate, Set Aside orCorrect Sentence (Doc. 10 in CV 10-2006-PHX-DGC (LOA)) is denied and the civil action opened in connec tion with this Motion (CV 10-2006-PHX-DGC (LOA)) is dismissed with prejudice. The Clerk of Court must enter judgment accordingly.Pursuant to Rule 11(a) of the Rules Governing Section 2255 Cases, in the eventMovant files an appeal, the Court declines to issue a certificate of appealability because reasonable jurists would not find the Courts procedural ruling debatable. See Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000). (See document for further details). Signed by Judge David G Campbell on 7/12/11.(LAD)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Garcia-Espinoza v. United States of America
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Petitioner: Rafael Garcia-Espinoza
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Respondent: United States of America
Represented By:	Krissa Marie Lanham
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?