Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation v. Silvermist LLC et al
Plaintiff:
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation
Defendant:
Silvermist LLC, Marylu Macabuhay and Ronolfo Macabuhay
Thirdparty_defendant:
Joseph Tameron, LarsonAllen LLP, Skinner Tameron & Company LLP and Kathy Tameron
Counter_claimant:
Silvermist LLLP, Ronolfo Macabuhay and Marylu Macabuhay
Counter_defendant:
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation
Thirdparty_plaintiff:
Silvermist LLLP, Ronolfo Macabuhay and Marylu Macabuhay
Case Number:
2:2010cv02447
Filed:
November 10, 2010
Court:
Arizona District Court
Office:
Phoenix Division Office
County:
Maricopa
Presiding Judge:
David G Campbell
Nature of Suit:
Foreclosure
Cause of Action:
28:1441
Jury Demanded By:
Defendant
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Date Filed | # | Document Text |
|---|---|---|
| January 27, 2011 | 16 |
ORDER - IT IS ORDERED: 1. The FDIC's motion to dismiss counterclaims or stay this action (Doc. 6 ) is granted in part and denied in part. The motion is denied to the extent it seeks dismissal and granted with respect to the stay request. 2. Thi s action is stayed until the earlier of 180 days from the date Silvermist files an administrative claim or 10 days after the FDIC has issued a final determination on the claim. 3. The FDIC shall file a status report no later than 4/1/2011. Signed by Judge David G Campbell on 1/27/11. (SAT)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
