Henry v. United States of America

Justia Dockets & Filings Ninth Circuit Arizona District Court Henry v. United States of America

Henry v. United States of America

Petitioner:	Mason James Henry
Respondent:	United States of America
Case Number:	2:2010cv02776
Filed:	December 23, 2010
Court:	US District Court for the District of Arizona
Office:	Phoenix Division Office
County:	XX US, Outside State
Presiding Judge:	Mark E Aspey
Presiding Judge:	James A Teilborg
Nature of Suit:	Motions to Vacate Sentence
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 2255
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
September 1, 2011	Filing 23 ORDER ACCEPTING AND ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS 15 . IT IS ORDERED that the motion to recuse (Doc. 18) and the motion to amend or supplement (Doc. 19) are denied. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Report and Recommendation (Doc. 15) is accepted and adopted, the objections (Doc. 20) are overruled, and the motion (Doc. 1) is denied, with prejudice, and the Clerk of the Court shall enter judgment accordingly. IT IS FINALLY ORDERED that pursuant to Rule 11 of the Rules Governing Section 2255 Proce edings, in the event Movant files an appeal, the Court grants issuance of a certificate of appealability on Movants claim that he did not knowingly and voluntarilyenter his plea agreement because his counsel was ineffective. (See document for details). Signed by Judge James A Teilborg on 8/31/11. (LAD)

Date Filed

Document Text

September 1, 2011

Filing 23 ORDER ACCEPTING AND ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS 15 . IT IS ORDERED that the motion to recuse (Doc. 18) and the motion to amend or supplement (Doc. 19) are denied. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Report and Recommendation (Doc. 15) is accepted and adopted, the objections (Doc. 20) are overruled, and the motion (Doc. 1) is denied, with prejudice, and the Clerk of the Court shall enter judgment accordingly. IT IS FINALLY ORDERED that pursuant to Rule 11 of the Rules Governing Section 2255 Proce edings, in the event Movant files an appeal, the Court grants issuance of a certificate of appealability on Movants claim that he did not knowingly and voluntarilyenter his plea agreement because his counsel was ineffective. (See document for details). Signed by Judge James A Teilborg on 8/31/11. (LAD)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Henry v. United States of America
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Petitioner: Mason James Henry
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Respondent: United States of America
Represented By:	Thomas C Simon
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?