AMF Bowling Worldwide Incorporated v. Ramos et al
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|Date Filed||#||Document Text|
|February 13, 2012
ORDER that K.T.'s sealed 57 Supplemental Motion for Approval of Minor's Settlement, and the sealed 60 Stipulation for Distribution of Funds, are GRANTED. The Court approves the settlement of this action and the distribution of the proc eeds as agreed by the parties. A separate distribution order has been issued to the Clerk of Court consistent with this order. (Doc. 66 ) The Clerk is kindly directed to terminate this action. Signed by Magistrate Judge Lawrence O Anderson on 2/13/12.(MAP)
|January 3, 2012
ORDER, that Liberty Life's 52 Revised Motion for Dismissal and Discharge of, and for an Award of Attorney's Fees and Costs to, Liberty Life, is GRANTED.Plaintiff Liberty Life is hereby dismissed with prejudice from this action and is f ully discharged from any further obligation and liability to any person, whether a party herein or not, with respect to Gilbert Ramos' life insurance policy with Liberty Life, Policy No. NF3-39621478. That Liberty Life is awarded $13,955. 80 for Liberty Life's attorneys' fees and costs incurred herein. The Clerk of Court is kindly directed to promptly pay Liberty Life the sum of $13,955.80 from the interpled funds in the District Court of Arizona's registry to Liberty Life's counsel of record. That counsel shall delete Liberty Life's full name in the caption in all future filings in this case. Signed by Magistrate Judge Lawrence O Anderson on 1/3/12.(DMT)
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?