Deng v. Kane

Petitioner: Fuyin Yin Deng
Respondent: Katrina S Kane
Case Number: 2:2011cv00249
Filed: February 7, 2011
Court: Arizona District Court
Office: Phoenix Division Office
County: Pinal
Referring Judge: Michelle H Burns (PS)
Presiding Judge: Roslyn O Silver
Nature of Suit: Other
Cause of Action: 28:2241
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
December 2, 2011 15 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION 12 . The Petition (Doc. 1) is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE as moot. IT IS ORDERED a Certificate of Appealability and leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal is denied because failure to file timely objections to any factual determinations of the Magistrate Judge is considered a waiver of a party's right to appellate review of those findings of fact. Fed. R. Civ. P. 72. Signed by Chief Judge Roslyn O Silver on 12/1/11. (DMT)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Deng v. Kane
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Katrina S Kane
Represented By: Cynthia M Parsons
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Fuyin Yin Deng
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?