Tohono O'odham Nation v. Glendale, City of et al
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|Date Filed||#||Document Text|
|June 30, 2011
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 28 Motion for Summary Judgment; granting in part and denying in part 23 Motion for Summary Judgment. Summary judgment is granted in favor of Plaintiff on the preemption claim asserted in count one, and i n favor of Defendants on counts two through six. The Court declares that H.B. 2534, as applied in this case, is preempted by the Gila Bend Act, Pub. L. No. 99-503, 100 Stat. 1798 (Oct. 20, 1986). The Clerk is directed to enter judgment accordingly. Signed by Judge David G Campbell on 6/30/11.(DMT)
|March 23, 2011
ORDER - The motion to transfer related case (Doc. 119, CV-10-1993) is granted. The Clerk is directed to transfer Case No. CV-11-279-PHX-NVW to the undersigned Judge. The joint motion to increase page limits (Doc. 20, CV-11 279) is granted. The consen t motion for the entry of a scheduling order (Doc. 22, CV 11-279) is granted. The following schedule will govern briefing of motions for summary judgment under Rule 56 and dismissal under Rule 12: The Nation's summary judgment motion was filed o n March 18, 2011. Defendants' combined oppositions and cross-motions for summary judgment, including any arguments for dismissal under Rule 12, are due by April 18, 2011. The Nation's combined reply and opposition is due by May 9, 2011. Defendants' replies are due by May 24, 2011. Oral argument is set for June 3, 2011, at 2:00 p.m. Signed by Judge David G Campbell on 3/23/11. (KMG)
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?