Ellis v. Hartsuck et al
| Frederick Michael Ellis |
| Keith Hartsuck and Attorney General of the State of Arizona |
| 2:2011cv00297 |
| February 14, 2011 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Phoenix Division Office |
| Pima |
| Jay R Irwin |
| James A Teilborg |
| General |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
17
ORDER that the Magistrate Judge's 16 Report and Recommendation is ACCEPTED; accordingly, Petitioner's 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is denied and dismissed with prejudice. The Court denies issuance of a certificate of appealability. The Clerk of the Court shall enter judgment of dismissal with prejudice. Signed by Judge James A Teilborg on 6/21/2012. (LFIG)
|
|
Filing
4
ORDER - IT IS ORDERED: Petitioner's Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (Doc. 3 ) is granted. The Clerk of Court must serve a copy of the Petition (Doc. 1 ) and this Order on the Respondent and the Atty General of the State of Arizona by certified mail. Respondents must answer the Petition within 40 days of the date of service. Petitioner's Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (Doc. 3) is granted. Petitioner may file a reply within 30 days from the date of service of the answer. This matter is referred to Magistrate Judge Jay R. Irwin for further proceedings and a report and recommendation. Signed by Judge James A Teilborg on 3/1/11. (SAT) Modified on 3/1/2011 to reflect "WO" (SAT).
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
