Schrock et al v. Federal National Mortgage Association et al
| Jodi Marie Esch and David Thomas Schrock |
| Federal National Mortgage Association, CitiMortgage Incorporated and Unknown Parties |
| 2:2011cv00567 |
| March 25, 2011 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Phoenix Division Office |
| Maricopa |
| James A Teilborg |
| Negotiable Instrument |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
37
ORDER - IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Defendants Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 11) isGRANTED in part and DENIED in part; the motion is granted as to all claims except thewrongful foreclosure claim and the quiet title claim.IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defend ants' request for attorney's fees is DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiffs may file an amended complaint no later than 21 days from the date of this Order. If Plaintiffs do not file an amended complaint within 21 days, then this case will proceed on only the wrongful foreclosure claim and the quite title claim. If no amended complaint is filed, Defendants shall answer within 30 days of the date of this Order. Signed by Judge James A Teilborg on 8/2/11.(LAD)
|
|
Filing
6
ORDER - By Tuesday, 4/5/2011, the parties shall file supplemental briefs addressing all issues raised in the attached order. Each supplemental brief shall not exceed 20 pages. Signed by Judge James A Teilborg on 3/31/2011. (TLB)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
