Silving et al v. Wells Fargo Bank NA et al
Marcus Silving and Deborah Bader |
First American Title Insurance Company, Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems Incorporated, Unknown Parties, U.S. Bank NA and Wells Fargo Bank NA |
2:2011cv00676 |
April 6, 2011 |
US District Court for the District of Arizona |
Phoenix Division Office |
Maricopa |
David G Campbell |
Foreclosure |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1444 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 83 ORDER denying 75 Motion for Reconsideration. Signed by Judge David G Campbell on 3/9/2012.(NVO) |
Filing 65 ORDER granting 51 Motion to Dismiss. The Clerk of Court is directed to terminate this action. (See document for further details). Signed by Judge David G Campbell on 1/18/12.(LAD) |
Filing 35 ORDER - IT IS ORDERED: 1. Plaintiffs' motion to remand (Doc. 20) is denied.2. Plaintiffs' motion for summary disposition (Doc. 31) is denied. 3. Defendants' motion to dismiss (Doc. 10) is granted in part and denied inpart as stated abo ve. 4. Defendants' motion to quash the lis pendens (Doc. 10) is denied. 5. Plaintiffs shall file an amended complaint within 20 days of this order. 6. The Court will set a case management conference by separate order. 7. The parties should address briefing of the preliminary injunction motion in their Rule 26(f) report and at the case management conference. (See document for further details). Signed by Judge David G Campbell on 7/6/11.(LAD) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.