Runyan v. Phoenix, City of et al
Jason Lee Runyan |
Phoenix, City of, Jared Price, Unknown Price, Alaa Bartley, Unknown Bartley, David Seitter, Unknown Seitter, Jeff Middleton, Unknown Middleton, Brian Authement, Unknown Authement and Unknown Parties |
2:2011cv00983 |
May 17, 2011 |
US District Court for the District of Arizona |
Phoenix Division Office |
Maricopa |
Robert C Broomfield |
Mark E Aspey |
Civil Rights |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 44 ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE: ORDERED this case is dismissed in its entirety, with prejudice, each party to bear their own costs and attorney fees. Signed by Senior Judge Robert C Broomfield on 5/3/12. (LFIG) |
Filing 4 ORDER that Defendants must answer the Complaint. Plaintiff must either serve each Defendant not already served1 or seek a waiver of service for each Defendant not already served. If Plaintiff does not either obtain a waiver of service of the summons or complete service of the Summons and Complaint on a Defendant within 120 days of the filing of the Complaint, the action may be dismissed as to each Defendant not served. Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(m). Defendants must answer the Complaint or otherwise respo nd by appropriate motion within the time provided by the applicable provisions of Rule 12(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. This matter is referred to Magistrate Judge Mark E. Aspey for all pretrial proceedings. Signed by Judge Robert C Broomfield on 5/20/11. (ESL) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.