Vesecky v. Wilshire Aspirations LLC

Plaintiff: Georgene Vesecky
Defendant: Wilshire Aspirations LLC
Case Number: 2:2011cv01180
Filed: June 15, 2011
Court: Arizona District Court
Office: Phoenix Division Office
County: Maricopa
Presiding Judge: Lawrence O Anderson
Nature of Suit: Americans with Disabilities - Other
Cause of Action: 42:12181
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
March 6, 2012 37 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER granting Plaintiff's 30 Motion for Attorney Fees; the Court awards Plaintiff reasonable attorneys' fees and litigation expenses in the amount of $12,786.81, and directs the Clerk to enter judgment in favor of Plaintiff in this amount and terminate this action. Signed by Magistrate Judge Lawrence O Anderson on 3/5/12.(REW)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Vesecky v. Wilshire Aspirations LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Georgene Vesecky
Represented By: David J Don
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Wilshire Aspirations LLC
Represented By: David Thomas Bonfiglio
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?