Bertanelli v. Ryan et al
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|Date Filed||#||Document Text|
|October 1, 2012
ORDER denying Plaintiff's 63 and 70 Objections. Signed by Senior Judge Paul G Rosenblatt on 10/1/2012.(LFIG)
|July 17, 2012
ORDER denying 52 "Objection to Magistrate Order Denying (Count II) of Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to File First Amended Complaint." Signed by Senior Judge Paul G Rosenblatt on 7/17/12.(LAD)
|May 22, 2012
ORDER - IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to File a First Amended Complaint, doc. 36, is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Clerk of Court is directed to filed the First Amended Complaint attached to Plaintiff's Motion for Le ave to File a First Amended Complaint, doc. 36 - attachment. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion in Opposition to Court's Anticipated Screening Order, doc. 37, is DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants' Motion to Dismi ss, doc. 34, and Plaintiff's Motion for Order Not to Respond to Motion to Dismiss, doc. 38, are DENIED as moot in view of the filing of the First Amended Complaint. (See document for further details). Signed by Magistrate Judge Lawrence O Anderson on 5/22/12.(LAD)
|February 13, 2012
ORDER - IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion for Court Order to File Delayed Preliminary Injunction Appeal (Doc. 22) is DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion for "Stay of Ruling" on Plaintiff's Motion Re Amended Complaint During Pendency of Plaintiff's Motion for Filing Delayed Preliminary Injunction Appeal Ruling (Doc. 24) is DENIED as moot. (See document for further details). Signed by Judge Paul G Rosenblatt on 2/13/12.(LAD)
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?