Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Recession Proof USA LLC
Plaintiff: Equal Employment Opportunity Commission
Defendant: Recession Proof USA LLC
Case Number: 2:2011cv01355
Filed: July 7, 2011
Court: US District Court for the District of Arizona
Office: Phoenix Division Office
County: Maricopa
Presiding Judge: Michelle H Burns
Nature of Suit: Employment
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
December 5, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 68 MEMORANDUM OF DECISION AND ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED adopting in part and denying in part the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Bridget S. Bade 60 . IT IS FURTHER ORDERED GRANTING Plaintiff's Motion for Default Judgment against Defendants Recession Proof USA LLC and Prime Time Marketing Solutions LLC d/b/a USA Supreme Technology, as set forth below, and be denied in all other respects 48 ; DENYING Plaintiff's Objection to Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommen dation and denying Plaintiff's motion for leave to amend complaint 67 ; GRANTING Richard Miller equitable remedies in the amount of $41,461 in back pay and $276 in prejudgment interest, totaling $41,737 in equitable damages aga inst Defendants Recession Proof USA LLC and Prime Time Marketing Solutions LLC d/b/a USA Supreme Technology; GRANTING Ron Frasso equitable remedies in the amount of $34,784 in back pay and $228.19 in prejudgment interest, totaling $ 35,012.19 in equitable damages against Defendants Recession Proof USA LLC and Prime Time Marketing Solutions LLC d/b/a USA Supreme Technology. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED awarding Richard Miller $15,000 in compensatory and $5,000 in punitive d amages against Defendants Recession Proof USA LLC and Prime Time Marketing Solutions LLC d/b/a USA Supreme Technology; awarding Ron Frasso $5,000 in compensatory and $5,000 in punitive damages against Defendants Recession Proof USA LLC an d Prime Time Marketing Solutions LLC d/b/a USA Supreme Technology; awarding Miller and Frasso post-judgment interest under 28 U.S.C. § 1961. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED DISMISSING Plaintiff's hostile work environment claim pursuant to Plainti ff's voluntary withdrawal of that claim. (See Doc. 51 at 7.) IT IS FURTHER ORDERED GRANTING INJUNCTIVE RELIEF; this Court retains jurisdiction over this matter in order to enforce the injunctive relief; denying without prejudice Plaintiff's request for attorney's fees and costs; the Clerk of Court is directed to enter judgment accordingly. Signed by Senior Judge Stephen M McNamee on 12/4/2013. (See attached PDF for complete information)(ALS)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Recession Proof USA LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Recession Proof USA LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Equal Employment Opportunity Commission
Represented By: Andrea Gail Baran
Represented By: Meenoo Chahbazi
Represented By: Mary Joleen O'Neill
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?