Ramirez-Valadez v. United States of America
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|Date Filed||#||Document Text|
|April 12, 2012
ORDER ACCEPTING AND ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS 6 . IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Movant's Motion to Vacate, Set Aside or Correct Sentence pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (Doc. 1) is DENIED WITH PREJUDICE; and the Clerk of the Court s hall enter judgment accordingly. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, consistent with the unobjected-to recommendation in the R&R, and in the event movant files an appeal, the Court denies issuance of a certificate of appealability because jurists of reason would not find the procedural rulings debatable and Movant has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right on the remaining claims. (See document for full details). Signed by Judge James A Teilborg on 4/12/12. (LAD)
|August 11, 2011
ORDER The Clerk of Court must serve a copy of the § 2255 Motion (Doc. 1 in CV-11-1553-PHX-JAT (JRI)) and this Order on the United States Attorney for the District of Arizona. The parties and the Clerk of Court must file all documents related to the § 2255 Motion in the civil case. The United States Attorney for the District of Arizona has 60 days from the date of service within which to answer the § 2255 Motion. Movant may file a reply within 30 days from the date of service of th e answer to the § 2255 Motion. The matter is referred to Magistrate Judge Jay R. Irwin pursuant to Rules 72.1 and 72.2 of the Local Rules of Civil Procedure for further proceedings and a report andrecommendation. Signed by Judge James A Teilborg on 8/11/2011. (KMG)
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?