Warren et al v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
Plaintiff: Richard Eugene Warren and Scott Arreola
Defendant: Federal Bureau of Prisons, Unknown Smith and Unknown Benefield
Case Number: 2:2011cv01774
Filed: September 8, 2011
Court: U.S. District Court for the District of Arizona
Office: Phoenix Division Office
County: Maricopa
Presiding Judge: Michelle H Burns (PS)
Presiding Judge: Robert C Broomfield
Nature of Suit: Prison Condition
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
December 12, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER that Mr. Warren's response, 7 , is construed as a motion for reconsideration. Mr. Warren's motion for reconsideration is granted to the extent that each Petitioner must file a separate new action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241 raising their respective claims at issue in this case. The Clerk of Court must mail each Petitioner the court-approved forms for filing an Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (Habeas) and a petition for writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. & #167; 2241 by a federal prisoner. The 8 "Second Amendment to Original Complaint for Further Violations of Law and Constitutional Rights Pursuant to Title 28 § 2241" is dismissed without prejudice to each Petitioner filing a new separate action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. Signed by Judge Robert C Broomfield on 12/11/11. (DMT)
October 21, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER the First Amended Petition and this action are dismissed without prejudice to each Petitioner commencing a new separate case. The Clerk of Court will enter a judgment of dismissal without prejudice. The Clerk of Court must mail each Petitioner the court-approved forms for filing an Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (Non-Habeas) and a civil rights complaint by use by a prisoner. Signed by Judge Robert C Broomfield on 10/21/11. (TLJ)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Warren et al v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Richard Eugene Warren
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Scott Arreola
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Federal Bureau of Prisons
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Unknown Smith
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Unknown Benefield
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?