Quanta Indemnity Company v. Amberwood Development Incorporated, et al
| Quanta Indemnity Company |
| Summerset Marketing Enterprises Incorporated, Unknown Parties, Amberwood Homes LLC, Roll Tide LLP and Amberwood Development Incorporated |
| 2:2011cv01807 |
| September 15, 2011 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Phoenix Division Office |
| XX US, Outside State |
| G Murray Snow |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2201 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
194
ORDER denying 138 Quanta Indemnity Company's Motion for Summary Judgment; FURTHER ORDERED denying 139 Defendant General Fidelity Insurance Company's Motion for Summary Judgment; FURTHER ORDERED granting in part and denying in part [14 1] North American Specialty's Motion for Summary Judgment. FURTHER ORDERED denying without prejudice Quanta's request for costs and attorneys' fees. See attached Order for details. Signed by Senior Judge James A Teilborg on 3/26/2014.(TLB)
|
|
Filing
181
ORDER - granting 178 Motion for Expedited Consideration. FURTHER ORDERED denying 177 Motion to Strike without prejudice to raising the same arguments in the replies. FINALLY ORDERED denying 179 Motion for Extension of Time to File Replies. Signed by Senior Judge James A Teilborg on 12/3/2013.(TLB)
|
|
Filing
155
ORDER - IT IS ORDERED that the motion to seal (Doc. 148 ) is denied. The Documents Lodged at Docs. 149 and 150 are stricken, but may remain under seal. General Fidelity shall file a response to the motion for summary judgment and controverting statement of facts by November 1, 2013. As indicated above, General Fidelity may not file both documents in their entirety under seal. If General Fidelity believes it can make the particularized showing required by Kamakana to file a particul ar exhibit or a particular fact in the response under seal, General Fidelity may move to file solely those items under seal. If General Fidelity so moves, it shall simultaneously file a redacted, unsealed version of both documents. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the stipulated protective order (Doc. 154 ) is denied, without prejudice. (See document for further details). Signed by Senior Judge James A Teilborg on 10/23/13. (LAD)
|
|
Filing
122
ORDER that Quanta Indemnity Company and Defendant General Fidelity Insurance Company's 103 Joint Motion for Voluntary Dismissal Without Prejudice of Coverage Claims re: Gribble and Banovac is granted in part and denied in part as set forth he rein. ORDERED that within 10 days of the date of this Order, Movants shall file a Notice with the Court indicating whether they still seek dismissal of the Banovac claims. If Movants do not file a Notice, the claims relating to Banovac v. Amberwood Development will be dismissed from this case without prejudice without further notice. Signed by Senior Judge James A Teilborg on 6/20/2013.(LFIG)
|
|
Filing
52
ORDER re 50 Supplement filed by Plaintiff: ORDERED that Plaintiff shall file a second supplement regarding jurisdiction by July 20, 2012 alleging the citizenship of the Johnson Family Trust. Signed by Judge James A Teilborg on 7/12/12. (SJF)
|
|
Filing
49
ORDER striking the 47 second amended complaint. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff must file the supplement required by this Court's order of June 14, 2012, by June 28, 2012. Signed by Judge James A Teilborg on 6/26/2012. (LFIG)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
