Mastro's Restaurants LLC v. Dominick Group LLC et al
| Mastro's Restaurants LLC |
| DPM Management Incorporated, Dennis Mastro, Michael Mastro, Jeffrey Mastro, Brenda Mastro, Scott Troilo, Dominick Group LLC, Mastro Properties LLC, Mastro Development Company and Dominick's Italian Steakhouse LLC |
| 2:2011cv01996 |
| October 13, 2011 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Phoenix Division Office |
| XX US, Outside State |
| Paul G Rosenblatt |
| Other Contract |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1125 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
100
ORDER granting 56 Motion to Compel. Plaintiff MR shall produce, no later than November 26, 2012, all communications between MR and Defendants relating to the Seventh Amendment to the APA. Signed by Senior Judge Paul G Rosenblatt on 11/5/12.(LAD)
|
|
Filing
80
ORDER denying 37 Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint. (See document for further details). Signed by Senior Judge Paul G Rosenblatt on 6/11/12.(LAD)
|
|
Filing
67
ORDER re 56 MOTION to Compel: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the parties engage in face-to-face or telephone consultation concerning the status of the discovery requests contained in Defendants' Motion to Compel and file a status report on those issues no later than April 27, 2012. The parties shall be prepared to discuss the issues at the May 2, 2012, oral argument. (See document for further details). Signed by Senior Judge Paul G Rosenblatt on 4/16/12. (LAD)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
