Alonzo v. United States of America

Justia Dockets & Filings Ninth Circuit Arizona District Court Alonzo v. United States of America

Alonzo v. United States of America

Petitioner:	Luis Arturo Alonzo
Respondent:	United States of America
Case Number:	2:2011cv02171
Filed:	November 4, 2011
Court:	US District Court for the District of Arizona
Office:	Phoenix Division Office
County:	XX US, Outside State
Presiding Judge:	Edward C Voss (PS)
Presiding Judge:	G Murray Snow
Nature of Suit:	Motions to Vacate Sentence
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 2255
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
February 26, 2013	Filing 11 ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION and Petitioner's Motion to Vacate, Set Aside or Correct Sentence 1 is denied. The Clerk of Court shall terminate this action. Any appeal of this decision would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Judge G Murray Snow on 2/26/13. (TLJ)
December 7, 2011	Filing 3 ORDER The Clerk of Court must serve a copy of the § 2255 Motion (Doc. 1 in CV-11- 2171-PHX-GMS (ECV)) and this Order on the United States Attorney for the District of Arizona. The parties and the Clerk of Court must file all documents related t o the § 2255 Motion in the civil case. The United States Attorney for the District of Arizona has 60 days from the date of service within which to answer the § 2255 Motion. Movant may file a reply within 30 days from the date of service of the answer to the § 2255 Motion. The matter is referred to Magistrate Judge Edward C. Voss for further proceedings and a report and recommendation. Signed by Judge G Murray Snow on 12/07/11. (ESL)

Date Filed

Document Text

February 26, 2013

Filing 11 ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION and Petitioner's Motion to Vacate, Set Aside or Correct Sentence 1 is denied. The Clerk of Court shall terminate this action. Any appeal of this decision would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Judge G Murray Snow on 2/26/13. (TLJ)

December 7, 2011

Filing 3 ORDER The Clerk of Court must serve a copy of the § 2255 Motion (Doc. 1 in CV-11- 2171-PHX-GMS (ECV)) and this Order on the United States Attorney for the District of Arizona. The parties and the Clerk of Court must file all documents related t o the § 2255 Motion in the civil case. The United States Attorney for the District of Arizona has 60 days from the date of service within which to answer the § 2255 Motion. Movant may file a reply within 30 days from the date of service of the answer to the § 2255 Motion. The matter is referred to Magistrate Judge Edward C. Voss for further proceedings and a report and recommendation. Signed by Judge G Murray Snow on 12/07/11. (ESL)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Alonzo v. United States of America
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Respondent: United States of America
Represented By:	Theresa Cole Rassas
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Petitioner: Luis Arturo Alonzo
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?