McKaney v. Keeton et al
||J Osteene, Kash Elkins, Charles Keeton, Unknown Anderson, D Sims and C Campanon
||January 23, 2012
||US District Court for the District of Arizona
||Phoenix Division Office
||Lawrence O Anderson (PS)
||G Murray Snow
|Nature of Suit:
|Cause of Action:
||42 U.S.C. § 1983
|Jury Demanded By:
Access additional case information on PACER
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|May 15, 2012
ORDER that 10 Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint and this action are dismissed for failure to state a claim, and the Clerk must enter judgment accordingly. The Clerk shall make an entry on the docket stating that the dismissal for failure t o state a claim may count as a "strike" under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). The docket shall reflect that the Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) and Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure 24(a)(3)(A), that any appeal of this decision would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Judge G Murray Snow on 5/15/12. (LSP)
|February 28, 2012
ORDER that this action shall proceed only as to Plaintiff Dwayne McKaney; all other "Plaintiffs" are dismissed. IT IS FURTHE ORDERED denying 7 Motion to Certify Class and granting 2 Plaintiff McKaney's Motion/Application for Leav e to Proceed in forma pauperis. Plaintiff must pay the $350.00 filing fee. The Complaint (Doc. 1) is dismissed with 30 days leave to amend. Clerk must enter dismissal with prejudice that states that the dismissal may count as a "strike" under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g) if Plaintiff fails to comply. Signed by Judge G Murray Snow on 2/28/12.(LSP)
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?