Anderson et al v. Ziprealty Incorporated
| Patricia Anderson and James Kwasiborski |
| Ziprealty Incorporated |
| 2:2012cv00332 |
| February 16, 2012 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Phoenix Division Office |
| Maricopa |
| James A Teilborg |
| Fair Labor Standards Act |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 201 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
83
ORDER that Plaintiffs' Motion for Conditional FLSA Certification, Authorization of Notice to Similarly Situated Persons Under 29 U.S.C. § 216(b), and Expedited Discovery (Doc. 61 ) is granted. Defendant is reminded that the deadline to fi le a motion for decertification is the dispositive motion deadline of February 10, 2014, established by the Rule 16 Scheduling Order (Doc. 43 at 4). IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiffs shall submit a revised copy of the Proposed Notice for final Co urt review no later than seven (7) days from the signature date of this Order. The final Notice to potential plaintiffs and consent to become party plaintiff should be mailed no later than fourteen (14) days after the Court issues final authorization of the Proposed Notice. IT IS FINALLY ORDERED that Defendant shall give Plaintiffs the relevant names and addresses within ten (10) days of this Order. Signed by Senior Judge James A Teilborg on 5/2/2013.(KMG)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
