Cadle Company v. N'Genuity Enterprises Company

Plaintiff: Cadle Company
Defendant: N'Genuity Enterprises Company
Case Number: 2:2012cv00351
Filed: February 21, 2012
Court: Arizona District Court
Office: Phoenix Division Office
County: XX US, Outside State
Presiding Judge: James A Teilborg
Nature of Suit: Withdrawal
Cause of Action: 28:0157
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
July 30, 2012 17 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER - IT IS ORDERED denying Cadle's Motion to Withdraw the Reference to theBankruptcy Court (Doc. 2). (See document for full details). Signed by Judge James A Teilborg on 7/30/12. (LAD)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Cadle Company v. N'Genuity Enterprises Company
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: N'Genuity Enterprises Company
Represented By: John R Clemency
Represented By: Joseph Eldon Cotterman
Represented By: Lindsi Michelle Weber
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Cadle Company
Represented By: David N Ingrassia
Represented By: Paul N Gilmore
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?