D'Ambrosio v. Maricopa County et al
Mary D'Ambrosio |
Maricopa, County of and Tara Spalding |
2:2012cv01182 |
June 4, 2012 |
US District Court for the District of Arizona |
Phoenix Division Office |
Maricopa |
G Murray Snow |
Other Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 27 ORDER Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 13 ) is GRANTED. D'Ambrosio's Amended Complaint is dismissed with prejudice. D'Ambrosio's Motion to Strike (Doc. 16 ) is denied as moot. D'Ambrosio's Motion for Judgment (Doc. 23 ) is denied as moot. Defendants' Motion to Strike (Doc. 24 ) is denied as moot. The Clerk of Court is directed to terminate this action. Signed by Judge G Murray Snow on 12/20/2012.(KMG) |
Filing 6 ORDER that Plaintiff's Amended Complaint (Doc. 5 ) may state a claim as to Defendants Tara Spalding and Maricopa County. Such a claim or claims may proceed. All other claims set forth in the Amended Complaint are dismissed. IT IS FURTHER ORDE RED that Plaintiff may serve the Summons and Amended Complaint upon the two remaining defendants pursuant to Federal Rule ofCivil Procedure 4(m). Plaintiff is further directed to familiarize herself with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rules for the District of Arizona which can be found on the Court's website at www.azd.uscourts.gov. Signed by Judge G Murray Snow on 8/13/2012. (KMG) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.