Wilson v. McDonald

Plaintiff: Dannie L Wilson
Defendant: J McDonald
Case Number: 2:2012cv01694
Filed: August 9, 2012
Court: Arizona District Court
Office: Phoenix Division Office
County: XX US, Outside State
Referring Judge: Mark E Aspey (PS)
Presiding Judge: Frederick J Martone
Nature of Suit: Prison Condition
Cause of Action: 42:1983
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
August 7, 2012 8 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER REOPENING CASE AND OF TRANSFER. Accordingly, this case is TRANSFERRED to the United States District Court of Arizona. The Clerk shall reopen this action, terminate any pending motions and transfer the entire file to the District of Arizona. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 8/3/2012. (ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/7/2012) [Transferred from cand on 8/9/2012.]

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Wilson v. McDonald
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: J McDonald
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Dannie L Wilson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?