Berger v. Baybik

Plaintiff: Oren Berger
Defendant: Erena Baybik
Case Number: 2:2012cv01757
Filed: August 16, 2012
Court: Arizona District Court
Office: Phoenix Division Office
County: Maricopa
Presiding Judge: David K Duncan
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
January 9, 2013 19 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER that Berger's 6 Amended Complaint is dismissed without prejudice for lack of jurisdiction. Berger shall have 30 days to file an Amended Complaint. If he fails to comply, the Clerk is directed to terminate this action. ORDERED striking Plaintiff's 15 Second Amended Complaint for failure to comply with L.R.Civ. 15.1. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Baybik's 8 MOTION to Dismiss is denied as moot. Signed by Judge G Murray Snow on 1/9/2013. (LFIG)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Berger v. Baybik
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Oren Berger
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Erena Baybik
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?