Zuniga-Hurtado v. Holder

Petitioner: German Zuniga-Hurtado
Respondent: Eric Himpton Holder, Jr.
Case Number: 2:2012cv01927
Filed: September 7, 2012
Court: Arizona District Court
Office: Phoenix Division Office
County: Pinal
Presiding Judge: G Murray Snow
Nature of Suit: Other
Cause of Action: 08:1252
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
July 24, 2013 117 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER that Petitioner German Zuniga-Hurtado's 114 Motion to Amend Judgment, or, in the alternative, Motion for New Trial is DENIED. Signed by Judge G Murray Snow on 7/24/2013.(LFIG)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Zuniga-Hurtado v. Holder
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: German Zuniga-Hurtado
Represented By: Andrew Foster Halaby
Represented By: David Gary Barker
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Eric Himpton Holder, Jr.
Represented By: Ada E Bosque
Represented By: Yamileth G Davila
Represented By: Rebecca Hoffberg Phillips
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.