Wendelschafer v. Astrue

Wendelschafer v. Astrue

Plaintiff:	Wade Wendelschafer
Defendant:	Michael J Astrue
Case Number:	2:2012cv01951
Filed:	September 14, 2012
Court:	US District Court for the District of Arizona
Office:	Phoenix Division Office
County:	Maricopa
Presiding Judge:	Neil V Wake
Nature of Suit:	Supplemental Security Income
Cause of Action:	42 U.S.C. § 405
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
April 16, 2014	Filing 31 ORDER, Plaintiff's Motion for Reconsideration of the Court's Order 30 dated 2/28/14 is granted; in light of the new and material evidence submitted with Plaintiff's Motion for Reconsideration, this Court's Order and Judgment ent ered on 2/28/14 are vacated; the final decision of the Commissioner is vacated; this matter is remanded to the Commissioner pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) for further administrative proceedings to consider whether Plaintiff was actually disabled during the period of time relevant to his first application in light of the new and material evidence; the Clerk shall enter judgment accordingly. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michelle H Burns on 4/15/14. (REW)
February 28, 2014	Filing 28 ORDER, the decision of the ALJ and the Commissioner of Social Security is affirmed; the Clerk shall enter judgment accordingly; the judgment will serve as the mandate of this Court. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michelle H Burns on 2/28/14. (REW)

Date Filed

Document Text

April 16, 2014

Filing 31 ORDER, Plaintiff's Motion for Reconsideration of the Court's Order 30 dated 2/28/14 is granted; in light of the new and material evidence submitted with Plaintiff's Motion for Reconsideration, this Court's Order and Judgment ent ered on 2/28/14 are vacated; the final decision of the Commissioner is vacated; this matter is remanded to the Commissioner pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) for further administrative proceedings to consider whether Plaintiff was actually disabled during the period of time relevant to his first application in light of the new and material evidence; the Clerk shall enter judgment accordingly. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michelle H Burns on 4/15/14. (REW)

February 28, 2014

Filing 28 ORDER, the decision of the ALJ and the Commissioner of Social Security is affirmed; the Clerk shall enter judgment accordingly; the judgment will serve as the mandate of this Court. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michelle H Burns on 2/28/14. (REW)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Wendelschafer v. Astrue
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Wade Wendelschafer
Represented By:	Eric Glenn Slepian
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Michael J Astrue
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?