Cleveland v. Arpaio et al
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|Date Filed||#||Document Text|
|June 19, 2014
ORDER: Plaintiffs First Amended Complaint 23 and this action are dismissed for failure to state a claim, and the Clerk of Court must enter judgment accordingly; Plaintiff's pending motions, notices, and briefs are denied to the extent that a ny relief is sought. (Docs. 24 26 27 30 33 ); The Clerk of Court must make an entry on the docket stating that the dismissal for failure to state a claim may count as a strike under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g); The docket shall reflect that the Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C.§ 1915(a)(3) and Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure 24(a)(3)(A), that any appeal of this decision would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Judge David G Campbell on 6/19/2014.(ALS)
|May 29, 2013
ORDER granting 2 Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. The Complaint is dismissed for failure to state a claim 1 . Plaintiff has 30 days from the date this Order is filed to file a first amended complaint. If Plaintiff fa ils to comply, the Clerk of Court must enter a judgment of dismissal with prejudice that states that the dismissal may count as a strike under 28:1915(g). The Clerk of Court must mail Plaintiff a court-approved form for filing a civil rights complaint by a prisoner. Plaintiff's other filings, including motions, notices, statements, letters, and requests are denied to the extent that any relief is sought therein [5-20]. Signed by Judge David G Campbell on 5/29/13.(TLJ)
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?