Cornelis et al v. B&J Smith Associates LLC et al
| Terrance Cornelis and Yvonne Cornelis |
| B&J Smith Associates LLC, B&J Smith Incorporated, Barry M Smith, Lynette B Walbom and Julia P Smith |
| 2:2013cv00645 |
| April 1, 2013 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Phoenix Division Office |
| XX US, Outside State |
| Bridget S Bade |
| Personal Injury: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Fraud |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
39
ORDER, Defendants' Motion to Dismiss 34 is granted; the Second Amended Complaint 32 is dismissed; the Clerk shall terminate this action. Signed by Magistrate Judge Bridget S Bade on 5/8/14.(REW)
|
|
Filing
29
ORDER - IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiffs' Motion for Leave to Amend Pleadings(Doc. 26 ) is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. It is ordered granting Plaintiffs' motion for leave to amend to request declaratory relief and to add a breach of contract claim that corrects the deficiencies identified in this Order. It is ordered denying Plaintiffs leave to amend to add a UFTA claim. Pursuant to LRCiv 15.1, within thirty days of the Order, Plaintiffs must file and serve a second amended c omplaint that complies with this Order. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants' Motion to Dismiss the Amended Complaint (Doc. 19 ) is DENIED as moot. (See document for full details). Signed by Magistrate Judge Bridget S Bade on 12/20/13. (LAD)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
