Metropolitan Life Insurance Company v. Reynolds et al
||Metropolitan Life Insurance Company
||Rosina Reynolds and Marlene Reynolds
||June 24, 2013
||US District Court for the District of Arizona
||Phoenix Division Office
||XX US, Outside State
||Bridget S Bade
|Nature of Suit:
|Cause of Action:
||29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
|Jury Demanded By:
Access additional case information on PACER
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|November 15, 2013
ORDER: MetLife's Motion to Deposit the Disputed Plan Benefits in the Court's Registry 23 is GRANTED; MetLife's Motion for an Order Dismissing it from this Action and Entering Injunctive Relief 23 is GRANTED; MetLife's Motion for Attorneys' Fees 23 is GRANTED and MetLife is awarded $3,307.20 in attorneys' fees; MetLife's Request for an Award of Costs is GRANTED and that MetLife is awarded $447.05 in costs. MetLife is excused from attending the Rule 16 Case Management Conference set for November 20, 2013. Signed by Magistrate Judge Bridget S Bade on 11/15/2013. (See attached PDF for complete information)(ALS)
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?