Bilyeu v. Myers et al
Sheila Bilyeu |
Thomas L Le Claire, Janice Crawford, Maricopa County Superior Court, Leo Bernard Myers, Cavanagh Law Firm and Phillip Gerard |
2:2013cv01484 |
July 22, 2013 |
US District Court for the District of Arizona |
Phoenix Division Office |
Coconino |
David G Campbell |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 27 AMENDED ORDER - Granting 8 , 11 , and 13 Defendants' Motions to Dismiss. The complaint 1 is dismissed with prejudice with respect to Defendants Crawford, LeClaire, and Maricopa County Superior Court and dismissed without prejudice with res pect to Defendants Leo Bernard Myers, The Cavanagh Law Firm, and Philip Gerard. Plaintiff shall have until 11/1/13 to file an amended complaint consistent with this order. The Rule 16 Case Management Conference set for 10/11/13 is vacated. Signed by Judge David G Campbell on 10/17/13. (TLJ) |
Filing 26 ORDER granting 8 , 11 , and 13 Defendants' Motions to Dismiss. The complaint (Doc. 1 ) is dismissed with prejudice with respect to Defendants Crawford, LeClaire, and Maricopa County Superior Court and without prejudice with respect to Defen dants Leo Bernard Myers, The Cavanagh Law Firm, and Philip Gerard. Plaintiff shall have until November 1, 2013 to file an amended complaint consistent with this order. The Rule 16 Case Management Conference set for October 11, 2013 is vacated. Signed by Judge David G Campbell on 10/10/13.(LSP) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.