Hernandez v. USA
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|Date Filed||#||Document Text|
|March 5, 2015
ORDER ACCEPTING IN PART AND DENYING PART THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION 23 - CJA attorney Matthew O. Brown is appointed as counsel of record to represent Petitioner in this matter. Evidentiary Hearing on Petitioner's Motion set for 4/2/2015 at 09:00 AM in Courtroom 602, 401 West Washington Street, Phoenix, AZ 85003 before Judge G Murray Snow. The Clerk of Court is directed to mail a copy of this Order to Mark Paige. The Court will issue a Writ for the transportation of Mr. Hernandez to the District of Arizona for the evidentiary hearing by separate order. (See document for further details). Signed by Judge G Murray Snow on 3/5/15. (LAD)
|October 25, 2013
ORDER the Clerk of Court must serve a copy of the 2255 Motion 1 , the Memorandum in Support 3 and this Order on the United States Attorney for the District of Arizona. The parties and the Clerk of Court must file all documents related to the 2255 Motion in the civil case. The United States Attorney for the District of Arizona has 60 days from the date of service to answer the 2255 Motion and Motion for Court Documents. Movant's Motion for Court Documents 4 is granted in part to the ext ent that the Clerk of Court must send Movant a copy of the docket for CR-09-1114-PHX-GMS. The Motion is denied without prejudice with respect to all other relief requested. Movant's Motion for Appointment of Counsel 5 is denied without prejudice. This matter is referred to Magistrate Judge Michelle H. Burns. Signed by Judge G Murray Snow on 10/25/13.(TLJ)
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?