Keith v. Colvin

Plaintiff: Deanna Keith
Defendant: Carolyn W Colvin
Case Number: 2:2013cv01892
Filed: September 12, 2013
Court: Arizona District Court
Office: Phoenix Division Office
County: Maricopa
Presiding Judge: James A Teilborg
Nature of Suit: Supplemental Security Income
Cause of Action: 42:405
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
June 16, 2016 31 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER that Defendant's Motion for Leave to File Sur-Reply (Doc. 29 ) is GRANTED. FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of Court shall file Defendant's surreply that is currently lodged at Docket No. 30 . IT IS FINALLY ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion for Order to Show Cause Why Defendant Should Not be Held in Contempt for the Willful Refusal to Comply with a Stipulated Court Order, (Doc. 25 ), is DENIED. Signed by Senior Judge James A Teilborg on 6/15/2016.(KMG)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Keith v. Colvin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Deanna Keith
Represented By: Eric Glenn Slepian
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Carolyn W Colvin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?