Sarabia-Labrador v. USA
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|Date Filed||#||Document Text|
|June 11, 2015
ORDER ACCEPTING AND ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION, that Movant's Second Amended Motion to Vacate, Set Aside or Correct Sentence pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (Doc. 10 ) is DENIED WITH PREJUDICE; and the Clerk of the Court shall enter judgment accordingly. IT IS FINALLY ORDERED that pursuant to Rule 11 of the Rules Governing Section 2255 Proceedings, in the event Movant files an appeal, the Court denies issuance of a certificate of appealability because Movant has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. Signed by Senior Judge James A Teilborg on 06/10/15. (ATD)
|November 19, 2013
ORDER Movant's Letter to the Clerk of the Court (Doc. 1 in CV 13-2193-PHX-JAT(SPL)) is denied with leave to amend. Movant has 30 days from the date of filing of this Order to file an amended motion in compliance with this Order. If Movant fail s to file an amended motion within 30 days, the Clerk of Court must, without further notice, terminate Document 201 in CR 12-417-001-PHX-JATand enter a judgment of dismissal of the civil action opened in connection with this § 2255 action (CV 13 -2193-PHX-JAT (SPL)), without prejudice. The Clerk of Court must mail Movant a court-approved form for filing a Motion to Vacate, Set Aside or Correct Sentence By a Person in Federal Custody (28U.S.C. § 2255). Signed by Senior Judge James A Teilborg on 11/19/2013. (KMG)
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?