Christopher v. RJM Acquisitions LLC
||RJM Acquisitions LLC
||November 7, 2013
||US District Court for the District of Arizona
||Phoenix Division Office
||Mark E Aspey
|Nature of Suit:
||Other Statutory Actions
|Cause of Action:
||15 U.S.C. § 1692
|Jury Demanded By:
Access additional case information on PACER
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|May 13, 2016
ORDER that LBBS's Motion to Withdraw as Counsel for Defendant RJM Acquisitions, LLC without Immediate Substitution, (Doc. 63 ), is DENIED as moot. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of Court shall refer this matter by random draw to a Unite d States Magistrate Judge to resolve Plaintiff's Motion for Appearance and Examination of Judgment Debtor RJM Acquisitions, LLC, (Doc. 68 ), which remains pending. LATER - Magistrate Judge Eileen S Willett is drawn by random lot. Signed by Senior Judge James A Teilborg on 5/13/16. (KGM)
|June 30, 2015
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 49 Plaintiff's Motion for Attorney Fees. Plaintiff is entitled to Attorney's Fees in the amount of $15,333.00. See attached Order. Signed by Senior Judge James A Teilborg on 6/30/2015.(TLB)
|February 3, 2015
ORDER that Defendant's 31 Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. The Clerk of the Court is ordered to enter judgment in favor of Defendant on Count I of Plaintiff's Complaint. ORDERED Plaintiff's 40 Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. The Clerk is ordered to enter judgment in favor of Plaintiff in the amount of $1,000 on Count II. Signed by Senior Judge James A Teilborg on 2/3/2015.(LFIG)
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?