J & J Sports Productions Incorporated v. Carbajal-Armendariz et al
| J & J Sports Productions Incorporated |
| Marina Carbajal-Armendariz and Carbajal's Mexican Food LLC |
| 2:2013cv02279 |
| November 7, 2013 |
| U.S. District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Phoenix Division Office |
| XX US, Outside State |
| Paul G Rosenblatt |
| Cable/Satellite TV |
| 47 U.S.C. ยง 0605 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
36
ORDER - IT IS ORDERED that defendant Marina Carbajal-Armendariz's Motion for Extension of Time Within Which to Respond to Requests for Admission Nunc Pro Tunc (Doc. 29 ) is granted. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 26 ) is granted pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 56 to the extent that the plaintiff, pursuant to Count I of its Complaint, is awarded the total sum of $1,100.00 from defendants Marina Carbajal-Armendariz and Carbajal's Mexican F ood, LLC pursuant to 47 U.S.C. § 605(e)(3)(C)(i)(II), as well as the additional sum of $2,500.00 from defendant Carbajal's Mexican Food, LLC pursuant to 47 U.S.C. § 605(e)(3)(C)(ii). The Clerk of the Court shall enter judgment for the plaintiff accordingly. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the plaintiff shall file its request for attorney's fees and costs in compliance with this Court's Local Rules. Signed by Senior Judge Paul G Rosenblatt on 6/1/15.(ATD)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
