Thompson v. Hartford Accident and Indemnity Company et al
William U Thompson |
Hartford Accident and Indemnity Company and Unknown Parties |
Hartford Accident and Indemnity Company |
William U Thompson |
2:2013cv02437 |
November 27, 2013 |
US District Court for the District of Arizona |
Phoenix Division Office |
Maricopa |
James A Teilborg |
Insurance |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 65 ORDER that Hartford's Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 53 ) with respect to Plaintiff's claim for breach of contract is GRANTED. Hartford's Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 53 ) with respect to Plaintiff's claim for unjust enrichment is GRANTED. Hartford's Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 53 ) with respect to Hartford's counterclaim of fraud against Plaintiff is DENIED. Signed by Senior Judge James A Teilborg on 12/16/15.(KGM) |
Filing 55 ORDER granting 24 Hartford's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment. FURTHER ORDERED dismissing with prejudice Plaintiff's claim against Hartford for the breach of the covenant of good faith and fair dealing. Signed by Senior Judge James A Teilborg on 3/30/2015.(TLB) |
Filing 6 ORDER - The Notice of Removal failing to sufficiently plead jurisdiction, IT IS ORDERED that by December 23, 2013, Defendant shall file an amended noticeof removal properly alleging federal subject matter jurisdiction, or this case will be remanded for lack of federal subject matter jurisdiction. Signed by Senior Judge James A Teilborg on 12/9/13. (TLB) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.