Kathleen Ann Nelson Revocable Trust Dated 03/20/97 et al v. Target Corporation et al
Kathleen Ann Nelson and Kathleen Ann Nelson Revocable Trust Dated 03/20/97 |
Target Store No. 936 and Target Corporation |
2:2013cv02519 |
December 11, 2013 |
US District Court for the District of Arizona |
Phoenix Division Office |
Maricopa |
Lawrence O Anderson |
Other Personal Injury |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
Both |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 29 ORDER denying 28 parties' joint motion to extend the Rule 16 deadlines. Signed by Magistrate Judge Lawrence O Anderson on 8/28/14. (LSP) |
Filing 17 ORDER denying 14 Motion Continuing Case on Inactive Calendar. If Plaintiff fails to appear at the April 18, 2014 scheduling conference, either physically or telephonically, this action will be dismissed without prejudice and without further noti ce for failure to prosecute. On the Court's own motion, If Plaintiff chooses to appear telephonically at the April 18, 2014 scheduling conference, Plaintiff shall notify the Court no later than 12:00 p.m. on April 17, 2014 that she intends to m ake a telephonic appearance by calling the undersigned's Judicial Assistant at (602) 322-7620. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff Kathleen Ann Nelson may appear at the April 18, 2014 scheduling conference by telephone by promptly calling the Court at (602) 322-7620 at 10:30 a.m. (See document for full details). Signed by Magistrate Judge Lawrence O Anderson on 4/9/14. (LAD) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.