Gause v. Maricopa County Correctional Health Services et al
Richard LeGrand Gause |
Maricopa County Mental Health Services, Unknown Party, Maricopa County Correctional Health Services and Maricopa County Jail |
2:2013cv02555 |
December 13, 2013 |
US District Court for the District of Arizona |
Phoenix Division Office |
Maricopa |
Robert C Broomfield |
Mark E Aspey (PS) |
Prison Condition |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 11 ORDER (Service Packet), Plaintiff's Motion for Indigent Legal Representation 7 is denied without prejudice; Plaintiff's Request for the Courts to Order Maricopa County Correctional Health to Release My Medical Records to Me 9 is denied as premature; Plaintiff's April 25, 2013 Document 10 is granted to the extent this Order addresses his First Amended Complaint and other filings; Defendants Dr. Friedman and Dr. Matt must answer the First Amended Complaint; the Clerk must send Plaintiff a service packet including the First Amended Complaint 8 , this Order, and both summons and request for waiver forms for Defendants Dr. Friedman and Dr. Matt; Plaintiff must complete and return the service packet to the Clerk within 21 days; this matter is referred to Magistrate Judge Mark E Aspey for all pretrial proceedings. Signed by Senior Judge Stephen M McNamee on 5/2/14. (REW) |
Filing 6 ORDER Directing Monthly Payments be made from Prison Account of Richard LaGrand Gause. Signed by Senior Judge Robert C Broomfield on 2/2/14. (LAD) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.