Sheehan v. Romulus Incorporated

Plaintiff: Crystal Sheehan
Defendant: Romulus Incorporated
Case Number: 2:2014cv00464
Filed: March 7, 2014
Court: Arizona District Court
Office: Phoenix Division Office
County: Maricopa
Presiding Judge: Neil V Wake
Nature of Suit: Fair Labor Standards Act
Cause of Action: 29:206
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
March 31, 2015 33 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER denying with prejudice Plaintiff Crystal Sheehan's 24 Motion to Amend. ORDERED granting IHOP's 22 Motion for Summary Judgment. Plaintiff Sheehan's Complaint is terminated with prejudice. The Clerk of Court shall terminate CV-14-464-PHX-SMM and enter judgment for Defendant. Signed by Senior Judge Stephen M McNamee on 3/30/2015.(LFIG)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Sheehan v. Romulus Incorporated
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Romulus Incorporated
Represented By: Heidi Nunn-Gilman
Represented By: Julie A Pace
Represented By: David A Selden
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Crystal Sheehan
Represented By: Clifford Phillip Bendau, II
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?