Nance v. Miser et al
| Keith Preston Nance |
| Allen Miser, Mike Linderman and Charles L Ryan |
| 2:2014cv00500 |
| March 11, 2014 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Phoenix Division Office |
| Pinal |
| David K Duncan (PS) |
| Robert C Broomfield |
| Prisoner: Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
43
ORDER, the reference to the Magistrate Judge is withdrawn as to Plaintiff's Motion to Take Judicial Notice 33 , which the Court construes as a motion for reconsideration; Plaintiff's Motion to Take Judicial Notice 33 is denied without prejudice. Signed by Senior Judge Stephen M McNamee on 5/22/15.(REW)
|
|
Filing
22
ORDER, the reference to the Magistrate Judge is withdrawn as to Plaintiff's Motion for Temporary Restraining Order and Preliminary Injunction 18 and otion for Emergency Temporary Restraining Order and Preliminary Injunction 20 ; Plaintiff 9;s Motion for Temporary Restraining Order and Preliminary Injunction 18 and Plaintiff's Motion for Emergency Temporary Restraining Order and Preliminary Injunction 20 are denied without prejudice. Signed by Senior Judge Stephen M McNamee on 3/24/15. (REW)
|
|
Filing
12
ORDER Directing Monthly Payments be made from Prison Account of Keith Preston Nance. Signed by Senior Judge Stephen M McNamee on 10/22/14. (REW)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
