Weller v. Richardson et al
Jeffery R Weller |
Nicholas DiPiazza, Glendale, City of, Glendale City Attorney's Office, Denver Wells, Sam Richardson and Christina A Parry |
2:2014cv00832 |
April 18, 2014 |
US District Court for the District of Arizona |
Phoenix Division Office |
Pima |
Michelle H Burns (PS) |
Robert C Broomfield |
Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 11 ORDER Plaintiff's "Motion that the Court Order Plaintiff's Civil Filing be Ordered as Criminal Allegations" (Doc. 10 ) is denied. Plaintiff shall have an additional 30 days from the date this Order is filed to file a first amende d complaint in compliance with the Court's June 26, 2014 Order. If Plaintiff fails to file an amended complaint within 30 days of this Order, the Clerk of Court must, without further notice, enter a judgment of dismissal of this action with prejudice. Signed by Judge Steven P Logan on 7/31/2014. (KMG) |
Filing 8 ORDER Directing Monthly Payments be made from Prison Account of Jeffery Weller. Signed by Senior Judge Stephen M McNamee on 6/26/2014. (LFIG) |
Filing 4 ORDER that within 30 days of the date this Order is filed, Plaintiff must either pay the $400.00 filing and administrative fees or file a complete Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. Clerk must enter dismissal without prejudice if plaintiff fails to comply. Signed by Senior Judge Stephen M McNamee on 4/28/14. (LSP) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.