Frankson v. United States of America

Plaintiff: Derrick Myran Frankson
Defendant: United States of America
Case Number: 2:2014cv01060
Filed: May 16, 2014
Court: Arizona District Court
Office: Phoenix Division Office
County: XX US, Outside State
Referring Judge: Mark E Aspey (PS)
Presiding Judge: James A Teilborg
Nature of Suit: Mandamus and Other
Cause of Action: 28:1355
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
March 31, 2015 13 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION, the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation 12 is adopted and accepted; Defendant's Motion to Dismiss 9 and Plaintiff's Motion to Dismiss 11 are granted; this matter is dismissed with prejudice; the Clerk shall enter judgment accordingly. Signed by Senior Judge James A Teilborg on 3/31/15. (REW)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Frankson v. United States of America
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: United States of America
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Derrick Myran Frankson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?